Dollar Amerika tukar, currency converterBURUNG DINOSAURUS
Some time ago the world media to load the recent discovery of a collection of fossils in China as evidence supporting the theory of evolution. Beijing's Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, released a statement that one of the six fossils in the group belonged to a "four-winged dino-bird" and that these extinct creatures can fly, or at least, hanging in trees. Darwinists mass media once again made all-out propaganda although this theory at all and has been repeatedly proven wrong.
In fact, there is absolutely no evidence to support their propaganda. Therefore, there is no "four-winged dino-bird" (a creature half bird half the dinosaurs) or any scientific data that supports the theory of evolution of birds from dinosaurs.
New Fossil: 20 million years younger than Archaeopteryx
Almost everyone who knew little about paleontology never heard of Archaeopteryx. The discovery of Archaeopteryx, including the most famous. This creature is a bird that lived about 150 million years ago. Archaeopteryx is important because it includes the oldest bird ever found until now. No one scientist has ever found a fossil bird older than Archaeopteryx. 1
Another important thing about Archaeopteryx is considered a bird he was true, with all the earmarks of a bird he had. Feathers are asymmetric with the birds today, including a perfect form of wings, the framework of a lightweight and hollow, the breastbone that supports flight muscles, as well as many other features that convinced the scientists that Archaeopteryx is a bird that can fly perfectly true .2
However, two features that really distinguish it from Archaeopteryx is the modern birds that have wings, claws, and teeth in its beak. Because these two features since the nineteenth century evolutionists are trying to show the bird as a "semi-reptilian". But these characteristics is not really a proof that shows a link between Archaeopteryx and reptiles. Research shows that Hoatzin, bird species are still alive, but also has claws on its wings when I was young. Archaeopteryx nor the only "toothed birds" because of other bird species in the past that exist in the fossil record also has teeth. 3
So, as we could understand, explanation of the evolutionists that Archaeopteryx is a kind of "primitive birds was" absolutely wrong, and scientists have accepted that this creature looks very much like modern birds. Leading bird expert professor at Kansas University's world, Alan Feduccia, stating, "Most of those who recently studied the anatomical traits of Archaeopteryx, discovered the creature more like birds than they ever thought before,". Propaganda of the supporters of Darwinism have been mistaken, and Feduccia also has stated that, until recently, "the resemblance of Archaeopteryx to theropod dinosaurs have been exaggerated." 4
In short, is the oldest bird Archaeopteryx that have the same characteristics as in modern birds, including in terms of his flying ability. Also, Archaeopteryx was around 150 million years.
Problems surrounding the age of fossils
Archaeopteryx shows one key fact: Birds have been around since 150 million years ago. They have been able to fly. If evolutionists want to put forward a number of "ancestors of birds," then these creatures must have lived before 150 million years ago.
This one fact alone is enough to show that statements about "four-winged dino-bird" which were distributed to the whole world is unfounded and untrue. Therefore, the fossils found in China and called Microraptor gui - which by evolutionists dicobatampilkan as "ancestors of birds primitive" - was just 130 million years old, in other words, 20 million years more easily at all from the oldest known bird . Obviously, it does not make sense to display a bird "as the ancestors of birds primitive" when there are a number of birds that have flown 20 million years before this creature exists.
Truly "age problem" is there on all fossil "dino-bird" which is believed to be the ancestors of birds. The evolutionists believe that birds descended from dinosaurs states that the ancestors of birds are theropod dinosaurs that walked on two legs. However, theropod dinosaurs appeared after Archaeopteryx in the notes fosil.5 Evolutionists always try to cover up this obvious gaffe. Same effort to conceal this fact very easily seen on news reports about the fossil Microraptor gui. All newspapers and magazines widely evolutionist announced that this fossil was "a primitive bird" 130 million years old, without feeling the need to mention that Archaeopteryx could fly through the air with perfect around 20 million years earlier.
Microraptor gui
Microraptor
So, if a creature called a "four winged dinosaur" is, in other words Microraptor gui?
Too early to answer this question. Much research still needs to be done on these fossils, and the results may be fundamentally changing the current view of the fossil. Similarly, all fossils "dino-bird" raised since the early 1990s all doubtful validity. One of the "feathered dinosaur", ie Archaeoraptor, is falsified fossils. Assessment of depth in the fossils of other dino-bird show that "the feathers" they turned out the fibers that contain collagen under kulit.6 In the words of Professor Feduccia, "Many dinosaurs have been shown as being covered with feathers that aerodynamically patterned without any evidence to support it. "7 In his book published in 1999, he wrote," In the end, no feathered dinosaur ever found, although a lot of dead dinosaurs with well-preserved skin has been found in diverse areas . '8
Thus, when searching for real answers about what it Microraptor gui, we must always remember the attitude of the evolutionists who fully prejudices and likes to flirt. These creatures may have very different anatomical structures with pictures "reconstruction" which appeared in the media.
This also has been identified by Professor Alan Feduccia. In a recent correspondence, he wrote:
"I am not yet convinced that the creature has four wings; may be that we are seen by the bird feathers that never actually existed, and it is really difficult to interpret. The characteristics of linking these animals with dromaeosaurus also very dubious. To be sure, very different tail dromaeosaurus've ever known, and the claws are not shaped curve, but only a little big. Also, the pubisnya more like birds. Perhaps we are witnessing not dromaeosaurus who can fly, but the remnants of the poultry in the early ... around 20-30 million years, long before Archaeopteryx. "9
And even if the interpretation of Microraptor gui prove correct, the theory of evolution would not get any confirmation of this. Throughout history, tens of millions of species have been living in the span of a very wide spectrum of biological, and many of these species are already extinct in the course of time. As flying mammals that exist today, such as bats, in olden times there were winged reptiles (pterosaurs). Many diverse groups of marine reptiles (such as ichthyosaurs) living in the past and then became extinct. But what was surprising about this is a broad spectrum of animals with different characteristics and anatomical structure came at once and in the form they completed perfectly, and not as a derivative of the forms of a more primitive ancestor. For example, we see the whole complex structure of birds came into existence suddenly in Archaeopteryx. There are no "primitive birds' wings. There are no "primitive flight." Beliefs about the existence of a primitive bird lungs are also quite unlikely, because lungs of poultry - a very different structurally from the lungs of reptiles and mammals - have complicated structures that do not tersederhanakan.10
In sum, the fossil record continued to show the conclusion that all living things appeared on earth through the creation, and not due to the influence of natural evolution. This last statement about the dino-bird was not able to change the facts.
(1) Although many parties have claimed that the fossils 225 million years old Protoavis is "the oldest bird", but this thesis is not widely accepted.
(2) For more information, please read the book by Harun Yahya, Darwinism Refuted: How the Theory of Evolution Breaks Down in the Light of Modern Science, Goodword Books, 2003.
(3) For example, 130 million-year-old Liaoningornis also have teeth in its beak (Read "Old Bird," Discover magazine, March 21, 1997)
(4) Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds, Yale University Press, 1999, p. 81.
(5) Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, Regnery Publishing, 2000, p. 117.
(6) Ann Gibbons, "plucking th e Feathered Dinosaur," Science, vol. 278, Number 5341 (Nov. 14, 1997), pp. 1.229-30
(7), Feduccia (1999), p. 130.
(8), Feduccia (1999), p. 132.
(9) Excerpts are taken from recent correspondence between the editor of our site with Prof. Feduccia. We are very grateful for his help.
(10) Michael Denton, A Theory in Crisis, Adler & Adler, 1986, pp. 210-212
In fact, there is absolutely no evidence to support their propaganda. Therefore, there is no "four-winged dino-bird" (a creature half bird half the dinosaurs) or any scientific data that supports the theory of evolution of birds from dinosaurs.
New Fossil: 20 million years younger than Archaeopteryx
Almost everyone who knew little about paleontology never heard of Archaeopteryx. The discovery of Archaeopteryx, including the most famous. This creature is a bird that lived about 150 million years ago. Archaeopteryx is important because it includes the oldest bird ever found until now. No one scientist has ever found a fossil bird older than Archaeopteryx. 1
Another important thing about Archaeopteryx is considered a bird he was true, with all the earmarks of a bird he had. Feathers are asymmetric with the birds today, including a perfect form of wings, the framework of a lightweight and hollow, the breastbone that supports flight muscles, as well as many other features that convinced the scientists that Archaeopteryx is a bird that can fly perfectly true .2
However, two features that really distinguish it from Archaeopteryx is the modern birds that have wings, claws, and teeth in its beak. Because these two features since the nineteenth century evolutionists are trying to show the bird as a "semi-reptilian". But these characteristics is not really a proof that shows a link between Archaeopteryx and reptiles. Research shows that Hoatzin, bird species are still alive, but also has claws on its wings when I was young. Archaeopteryx nor the only "toothed birds" because of other bird species in the past that exist in the fossil record also has teeth. 3
So, as we could understand, explanation of the evolutionists that Archaeopteryx is a kind of "primitive birds was" absolutely wrong, and scientists have accepted that this creature looks very much like modern birds. Leading bird expert professor at Kansas University's world, Alan Feduccia, stating, "Most of those who recently studied the anatomical traits of Archaeopteryx, discovered the creature more like birds than they ever thought before,". Propaganda of the supporters of Darwinism have been mistaken, and Feduccia also has stated that, until recently, "the resemblance of Archaeopteryx to theropod dinosaurs have been exaggerated." 4
In short, is the oldest bird Archaeopteryx that have the same characteristics as in modern birds, including in terms of his flying ability. Also, Archaeopteryx was around 150 million years.
Problems surrounding the age of fossils
Archaeopteryx shows one key fact: Birds have been around since 150 million years ago. They have been able to fly. If evolutionists want to put forward a number of "ancestors of birds," then these creatures must have lived before 150 million years ago.
This one fact alone is enough to show that statements about "four-winged dino-bird" which were distributed to the whole world is unfounded and untrue. Therefore, the fossils found in China and called Microraptor gui - which by evolutionists dicobatampilkan as "ancestors of birds primitive" - was just 130 million years old, in other words, 20 million years more easily at all from the oldest known bird . Obviously, it does not make sense to display a bird "as the ancestors of birds primitive" when there are a number of birds that have flown 20 million years before this creature exists.
Truly "age problem" is there on all fossil "dino-bird" which is believed to be the ancestors of birds. The evolutionists believe that birds descended from dinosaurs states that the ancestors of birds are theropod dinosaurs that walked on two legs. However, theropod dinosaurs appeared after Archaeopteryx in the notes fosil.5 Evolutionists always try to cover up this obvious gaffe. Same effort to conceal this fact very easily seen on news reports about the fossil Microraptor gui. All newspapers and magazines widely evolutionist announced that this fossil was "a primitive bird" 130 million years old, without feeling the need to mention that Archaeopteryx could fly through the air with perfect around 20 million years earlier.
Microraptor gui
Microraptor
So, if a creature called a "four winged dinosaur" is, in other words Microraptor gui?
Too early to answer this question. Much research still needs to be done on these fossils, and the results may be fundamentally changing the current view of the fossil. Similarly, all fossils "dino-bird" raised since the early 1990s all doubtful validity. One of the "feathered dinosaur", ie Archaeoraptor, is falsified fossils. Assessment of depth in the fossils of other dino-bird show that "the feathers" they turned out the fibers that contain collagen under kulit.6 In the words of Professor Feduccia, "Many dinosaurs have been shown as being covered with feathers that aerodynamically patterned without any evidence to support it. "7 In his book published in 1999, he wrote," In the end, no feathered dinosaur ever found, although a lot of dead dinosaurs with well-preserved skin has been found in diverse areas . '8
Thus, when searching for real answers about what it Microraptor gui, we must always remember the attitude of the evolutionists who fully prejudices and likes to flirt. These creatures may have very different anatomical structures with pictures "reconstruction" which appeared in the media.
This also has been identified by Professor Alan Feduccia. In a recent correspondence, he wrote:
"I am not yet convinced that the creature has four wings; may be that we are seen by the bird feathers that never actually existed, and it is really difficult to interpret. The characteristics of linking these animals with dromaeosaurus also very dubious. To be sure, very different tail dromaeosaurus've ever known, and the claws are not shaped curve, but only a little big. Also, the pubisnya more like birds. Perhaps we are witnessing not dromaeosaurus who can fly, but the remnants of the poultry in the early ... around 20-30 million years, long before Archaeopteryx. "9
And even if the interpretation of Microraptor gui prove correct, the theory of evolution would not get any confirmation of this. Throughout history, tens of millions of species have been living in the span of a very wide spectrum of biological, and many of these species are already extinct in the course of time. As flying mammals that exist today, such as bats, in olden times there were winged reptiles (pterosaurs). Many diverse groups of marine reptiles (such as ichthyosaurs) living in the past and then became extinct. But what was surprising about this is a broad spectrum of animals with different characteristics and anatomical structure came at once and in the form they completed perfectly, and not as a derivative of the forms of a more primitive ancestor. For example, we see the whole complex structure of birds came into existence suddenly in Archaeopteryx. There are no "primitive birds' wings. There are no "primitive flight." Beliefs about the existence of a primitive bird lungs are also quite unlikely, because lungs of poultry - a very different structurally from the lungs of reptiles and mammals - have complicated structures that do not tersederhanakan.10
In sum, the fossil record continued to show the conclusion that all living things appeared on earth through the creation, and not due to the influence of natural evolution. This last statement about the dino-bird was not able to change the facts.
(1) Although many parties have claimed that the fossils 225 million years old Protoavis is "the oldest bird", but this thesis is not widely accepted.
(2) For more information, please read the book by Harun Yahya, Darwinism Refuted: How the Theory of Evolution Breaks Down in the Light of Modern Science, Goodword Books, 2003.
(3) For example, 130 million-year-old Liaoningornis also have teeth in its beak (Read "Old Bird," Discover magazine, March 21, 1997)
(4) Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds, Yale University Press, 1999, p. 81.
(5) Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, Regnery Publishing, 2000, p. 117.
(6) Ann Gibbons, "plucking th e Feathered Dinosaur," Science, vol. 278, Number 5341 (Nov. 14, 1997), pp. 1.229-30
(7), Feduccia (1999), p. 130.
(8), Feduccia (1999), p. 132.
(9) Excerpts are taken from recent correspondence between the editor of our site with Prof. Feduccia. We are very grateful for his help.
(10) Michael Denton, A Theory in Crisis, Adler & Adler, 1986, pp. 210-212
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar